Glenn, thank you for reading. The glacial isostatic adjustment is another valid point. The financial recklessness of the proposed solutions is one more. I am not a climate science specialist. As a citizen, I looked at this issue closely because too many things sounded fishy to me. Whatever I touched, I found loopholes in scientific data, politicized interpretation, and hasty financial propositions.

In particular, when writing my article, I checked what https://www.skepticalscience.com/ has on every issue I questioned. I found this website as a selective collection of data with one side interpretation and great effort in avoiding facts and arguments not fitting their mantra.

I encourage readers to post links to publications disproving my arguments. All that I know I learned from others. In particular, I learned much more from people who disagree with me than from those applauding. I will keep it this way unless you, an expert in education, convince me that muting and hiding opposing views is the way to learn. I welcome the link proving your point.