Respectfully disagree. Of course, I am not a climate scientist, but have well-developed skills of scrutinizing data presented to me as science. In science there always are differences in opinions. After all, this what science is all about. Unfortunately, the IPCC crowd published its bible and refuses to address its critics. They do what you do to me, they say: read the bible again.

Your approach means that as not being a climate scientist you feel not qualified to scrutinize their work. With the difference of opinions between scientists, you make your choice not by trying to understand the scientific argument but by standing by the scientific positions supported by the majority of people claiming to be experts in the area.

My approach is that if I find the smallest loophole in the claimed to be scientific reasoning, they better be able to explain to me in away I can understand where I am wrong. Otherwise their theory is as good as a car with just one flat tire.