Tessa nailed it down perfectly.

It is important to mention that I disagree with almost every her article I read, not this one.

She has the talent and sensitivity of an extraordinary writer. This article proves that. Her weakness is in her political leanings. She displays it in the closing when she kills the strength of her reasoning by turning her article into an argument for the climate change mantra.

One can do exactly the opposite. Climate is that wild world that we need to respect and are not entitled to be protected from. The climate mantra that Tessa and others follow minimizes the natural causes of climate change and exaggerates the anthropogenic factors to give the masses the sense of false security that they can be protected from it because they are entitled to it.