These 11 points are what a reasonable person would do instinctively, but a scientist spelled it out in order. However, Dr. Rubin is missing the target.

I like the take on this issue by Ivar Giaever, a physics Nobel laureate: https://youtu.be/Dk60CUkf3Kw. He points out that the leading scientists consider global warming as incontrovertible, what is purely unscientific as in science everything can be questioned. Hence, in the current reality discussing climate change is as questioning dogma of Catholic Church.

For the sake of practicing his advice, I welcome Dr. Rubin to defend Carolyn Gregoire, whom I disagree with in this my polemic: https://medium.com/@hak1010/with-a-hoe-against-the-sun-5de7b838c1fa.