You completely ignore my reasoning and repeat your religious dogma about climate change. My text questioned this dogma, but your only answer is — read the bible. In science, even if one scientist can bring a valid argument questioning consensus all other scientists, the argument of this one scientist needs to be seriously addressed.

Also, by accusing me of being paid by the fossil industry interests, you prove to me that you just skimmed throughout my text but did not read it. I precisely explain that the money that the fossil industry can bring to the conversation are petty compared to the money that can be gained by people behind the climate change religion. That money polluted your mind to the point that you support nonsense that eventually will make rich people richer and you and me poorer.