You wish me to be hurt because you cannot find any rational response to my arguments.

In your response, you try, as old folks used to say, squeeze a baby into my belly, accusing me baselessly that I claim that “all of climatology is false.” You condemn me for not knowing the science. I would say that the science, in this case, is more than alarming weather reports. It is an ability to look at historical data. It is in logical deduction, not only in understanding climate but in applying decision science in finding the best policies.

The core of my argument is that the dominating political narrative is not based on science but is driven by politics. If it prevails, the only real outcome will be that the poor will be poorer, and the rich will be richer. I might die before you would suffer due to policies you support.